Whatever you trade, the hard part is telling a real edge from a lucky run. EdgeFound does that work on your own trades and tells you straight where you stand.
People come to EdgeFound at different points. Some have traded ICT for years and never got consistent ; they want to know why. Some are already making money and quietly worry it's a good run that's about to end. Some have the method down and just want to get better faster, the way a desk full of quants would go about it.
The work underneath is the same for all of them. You look at your own trades honestly, find out what's actually working and what was just luck, and get a little better every month instead of chasing the next acronym off YouTube.
EdgeFound is what does that work with you. It doesn't care what method you trade. Whatever you tag with (FVG, IFVG, BPR, killzone, narrative, or your own custom fields), it runs the statistics across every angle and tells you, in plain sentences, what's real, what was luck, and what's quietly stopped working.
Take any field where the difference between amateur and elite is real and measurable. A marathon runner. A professional musician. A hedge-fund quant. Each one has a system that does the same five things :
Amateurs train. Professionals have systems. Same effort, different output. The professional outperforms because the system makes the right work happen every day and the wrong work visible the moment it happens.
Retail discretionary trading is one of the few high-stakes disciplines where this fact is ignored. Traders learn a method (ICT, SMC, Wyckoff, whatever) and assume that learning the method IS the work. It is one piece of the work. The other piece, the one that decides whether you compound or plateau, is the system that tells you whether the method is producing real edges, in real conditions, with real statistical confidence.
Whatever you trade, EdgeFound measures whether it's actually working.
EdgeFound runs the statistical work that nobody else does for you. Across every dimension of your method, whatever that method is. Setup type, session timing, market context, instrument, risk size. You get a plain sentence back. "Your London-session reversal setup is statistically working across 142 trades. Your New York continuation setup is leaking 0.3R per trade across 89 samples." The quant techniques behind it (Wilson confidence intervals, Monte Carlo projection, conditional probability analysis, sample-size gating) run in the background. You never have to learn any of it. You just see what is real and what is not.
The same setup that works in one regime can fail in another. EdgeFound stamps every trade with the macro regime, the calendar context, and the positioning environment via MacroMap Research. So instead of asking "what is my win rate ?", you can finally ask "does this setup work in risk-off ?". That second question is the one that actually moves your performance, and no other journal asks it for you.
P&L only tells you whether you made money this week. It is silent on whether you actually fixed what you said you would fix. The Triangle Index gives you a composite score across three dimensions : Edges (do your setups work ?), Process (are you following your plan ?), Risk (are you sizing correctly ?). The Forge tracks the mistakes you keep repeating and surfaces them statistically, not as narrative blame. Demon Watch flags revenge trades, FOMO entries, overleveraging. Same statistical rigour as the edge analysis. This is the discipline layer the method does not have.
Knowing the method counts for nothing if you don't execute it, and you won't execute consistently without a routine you can keep. The Daily Flow is that routine : Morning Prep (chart bias + macro brief + pause checklist), Trail of Thoughts (a live multi-chart stream of your reasoning during the session), Trade Review (a per-trade card on the close, scored against your plan), Evening Reflection (three weighted questions + a paper-pad). Five minutes on a normal day. Built around the day a working trader actually has, which is why people stick with it.
EdgeFound isn't built around any one guru's framework. The fields are yours to define : setup type, narrative, session, bias timeframe, the mistakes you want to watch. Tag in ICT terms (FVG, IFVG, BPR, killzone, AMD, MMXM) and it works. Tag in plain technical analysis (support and resistance, trend or range, breakout or pullback) and it works the same. Wyckoff, Elliott, supply and demand, fundamentals, all fine. EdgeFound doesn't pick a method for you. It tells you whether the one you trade is working.
When a trader plateaus, the instinct is to look for a piece of the method they're missing. A new mentor. A new acronym. A new entry trigger. So they go find one. Months pass. The PnL barely moves. They go find another one.
The same trap runs one level up. Even traders who are already making money can sit there for years without knowing which parts of their edge are real and which are just leftovers from a market that has already moved on. They do well until they don't, and they can't tell you why. The method made them feel sure of themselves. It never showed them where that was misplaced.
The way out is the same at any stage. You look honestly at what you actually did, you find out which parts hold up across enough trades to mean anything, you watch the gap between the plan and the execution, and you keep doing it on a schedule you can actually keep.
This is the thing every serious trader I've read seems to land on eventually. Andrew Lo built a career on it. Brett Steenbarger writes about it constantly. Every prop-firm risk manager already works this way. EdgeFound just packages it for a retail discretionary trader, in five minutes a day. You keep your method. EdgeFound tells you, honestly, whether it's working.
Find out in five minutes a day.